Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 03:07

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Psychopathic individuals recognize unfairness but are less likely to punish it - PsyPost
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Pediatrician Reveals 1 Food She Wants More Parents to Feed Kids - TODAY.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What if the girl says that drama about you dating here? Is that a bad sign?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why is the government destroying the homeless instead of helping them?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How do you raise well-behaved children?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.